It appears that under the Felon, the First amendment that gives you the right to speak your mind without fear of reprisals is dead.
Yes, he was allowed to say whatever he wanted, but so should we be allowed to judge him for what he said.
The man has made many statements that showed exactly who he was.
Perhaps folks like me, who never listen to folks like him [his death was the first time that I got a whiff of sulfur about him] could get examples and put them out there so everyone can see what a scumbag he really was...
This reminds me of the Reichstag fire of February 27, 1933. A Dutch communist, named Marinus van der Lubbe, confessed and was convicted of the crime by the Nazis, and was executed. The “Reichstag Fire Decree” of February 28, 1933, included a list of crimes for which the death penalty was to be imposed instead of a life sentence, as was previously the case. The law concerning the imposition and execution of the death penalty was passed by Hitler's government on March 29, on the basis of the Enabling Act, which had been passed on March 23, 1933. It extended the law retroactively to January 31, 1933, thereby violating Article 116 of the Weimar Constitution which prohibited retroactive penalties. The Enabling Act itself, however, made this legislation constitutional, provided the office of the president and the Reichstag and Reichsrat were not affected. It could thus be applied to van der Lubbe. The Reichstag fire enabled Hitler to rule by “emergency power”. Could Robinson, or someone else later on, be today’s van der Lubbe? Does not all of this sound all too familiar? Remember how Chancellor Palpatine, who was also Darth Sidious, took power in Star Wars? If you have read this far, then you can see where I am headed.
I think you’re exactly right, and why they’ve been so desperate to tag the killer as trans, a leftist, or some other kind of person they’ve deemed to be an enemy of the state and culture. Because they can’t do that, they’re now simply shifting the terms of the battle to make it about public responses, which are infinitely more diffuse and easy to cherry-pick.
I am coming to believe that Robinson could NOT have killed Kirk. So, all the swirl about him and his trans roommate are totally irrelevant. This is a false flag that is quite similar to JFK’s assassination, along with the Reichstag fire. With JFK, Oswald could NEVER have fired all the shots from where he was in the Texas Book Depository using the rifle he had. Oswald was NOT a sharpshooter, and REAL sharpshooters, using the same gun, have tried to recreate the incident and found it to be impossible. The “mystery shooter” in the grassy-knoll killed JFK. The similarities here are stark. Robinson was also NOT a sharpshooter, and with the type of rifle he used, the chances of him hitting Kirk where he was at six-hundred yards away is VERY low. Also, when Kirk’s head snapped back, and he fell, due to the shots, it indicated a different angle then if it had been from Robinson’s position. Did Robinson ATTEMPT to shoot Kirk? Probably true. Was Robinson the killer? HIGHLY doubtful. The new “mystery shooter” may never be known. So, combine the JFK assassination and the Reichstag fire incident, and you see where I am going.
It appears that under the Felon, the First amendment that gives you the right to speak your mind without fear of reprisals is dead.
Yes, he was allowed to say whatever he wanted, but so should we be allowed to judge him for what he said.
The man has made many statements that showed exactly who he was.
Perhaps folks like me, who never listen to folks like him [his death was the first time that I got a whiff of sulfur about him] could get examples and put them out there so everyone can see what a scumbag he really was...
I’ll keep saying it. Nazism. Yes it’s the blueprint of the rise of Hitler
and N A Z I S M
This reminds me of the Reichstag fire of February 27, 1933. A Dutch communist, named Marinus van der Lubbe, confessed and was convicted of the crime by the Nazis, and was executed. The “Reichstag Fire Decree” of February 28, 1933, included a list of crimes for which the death penalty was to be imposed instead of a life sentence, as was previously the case. The law concerning the imposition and execution of the death penalty was passed by Hitler's government on March 29, on the basis of the Enabling Act, which had been passed on March 23, 1933. It extended the law retroactively to January 31, 1933, thereby violating Article 116 of the Weimar Constitution which prohibited retroactive penalties. The Enabling Act itself, however, made this legislation constitutional, provided the office of the president and the Reichstag and Reichsrat were not affected. It could thus be applied to van der Lubbe. The Reichstag fire enabled Hitler to rule by “emergency power”. Could Robinson, or someone else later on, be today’s van der Lubbe? Does not all of this sound all too familiar? Remember how Chancellor Palpatine, who was also Darth Sidious, took power in Star Wars? If you have read this far, then you can see where I am headed.
I think you’re exactly right, and why they’ve been so desperate to tag the killer as trans, a leftist, or some other kind of person they’ve deemed to be an enemy of the state and culture. Because they can’t do that, they’re now simply shifting the terms of the battle to make it about public responses, which are infinitely more diffuse and easy to cherry-pick.
I am coming to believe that Robinson could NOT have killed Kirk. So, all the swirl about him and his trans roommate are totally irrelevant. This is a false flag that is quite similar to JFK’s assassination, along with the Reichstag fire. With JFK, Oswald could NEVER have fired all the shots from where he was in the Texas Book Depository using the rifle he had. Oswald was NOT a sharpshooter, and REAL sharpshooters, using the same gun, have tried to recreate the incident and found it to be impossible. The “mystery shooter” in the grassy-knoll killed JFK. The similarities here are stark. Robinson was also NOT a sharpshooter, and with the type of rifle he used, the chances of him hitting Kirk where he was at six-hundred yards away is VERY low. Also, when Kirk’s head snapped back, and he fell, due to the shots, it indicated a different angle then if it had been from Robinson’s position. Did Robinson ATTEMPT to shoot Kirk? Probably true. Was Robinson the killer? HIGHLY doubtful. The new “mystery shooter” may never be known. So, combine the JFK assassination and the Reichstag fire incident, and you see where I am going.
The French proverb: "Qui veut tuer son chien l'accuse de la rage".
[He who wants to kill his dog accuses it of carrying rabies] has never been more true.
First you accuse an discredit, then move on to punish.
The true is true!!!